 The repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under such statute, unless the repealing Act shall so expressly provide, and such statute shall be treated as still remaining in...  Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana - Página 687de Indiana. Supreme Court, Charles Frederick Remy, George Washington Self, Philip Zoercher, William H. Adams, Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Emma Mary May - 1916Visualização completa - Sobre este livro
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1948 - 990 páginas
...termination date, the provisions of this Act and such regulations, orders, price schedules, and requirements shall be treated as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any proper suit, action, or prosecution with respect to any such right, liability, or offense." 56 Stat. 24. Since... | |
 | Indiana - 1976 - 1064 páginas
[ O conteúdo desta página é restrito ] | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1913 - 710 páginas
...repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture or liability incurred under such statute unless the repealing...action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture or liability." (Rev. Stat. 1881, par. 248.) Another statute of the State required... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1943 - 672 páginas
...repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under such statute, unless the...action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture, or liability." Section 6 (a) of the Post Office Appropriation Act approved April... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1942 - 868 páginas
...any liability incurred under such act unless the repealing act shall so expressly provide, and that such statute shall be treated as still remaining in...force for the purpose of sustaining any proper action for the enforcement of such liability. The language of section 206 (a) of the Act of June 16, 1933,... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1955 - 928 páginas
...Opinion •( the Court shall so expressly providej and such statute shall be treated as still remaining m force for the purpose of sustaining any proper action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture or liability. * * * So that, both the policy and the Act under which it was issued... | |
 | Robert Dewey Benedict, Benjamin Lincoln Benedict - 1882 - 776 páginas
...repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture or liability incurred under such statute, unless the...action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture or liability." Motion denied. For the United States, George Bliss. For claimants,... | |
 | 1869 - 954 páginas
...of any statute shall not have the effect of releasing or extinguishing any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under such statute, unless the...statute shall be treated as still remaining in force tor thu purpose of sustaining any proper action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty,... | |
 | 1907 - 1184 páginas
...repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under such statute, unless the repealing act shall so expressly provide." Thus the repeal of the Elkins Act would not exculpate any one who had violated that act and escaped... | |
 | 1881 - 638 páginas
...repeal of any statute shall not have the effect '.o release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture or liability incurred under such statute, unless the repealing act shall so expressly provide, because the words penalty, forfeiture or liability are not equivalent to the term punishment. But the... | |
| |
